It was very flattering to have such interest in this post when I first did put it up, although there was no content and I do apologize for that. I haven’t really been posting at all these last 2 weeks, I’ve started and almost finished the Summer Institute for this new Masters program and by the time I get home I can really only manage a few grunts before falling into bed.
And not in a sexy way.
Over the last 2 weeks, we’ve had the pleasure of meeting the deputy mayor of Ottawa, a deputy minister of the federal and provincial governments, and a whole plethora of super-thinkers on the topic of Philanthropy and Non-Profit Leadership. Although most of the time we moved so quickly the information was somewhat tricky to synthesize (I am sure the magic will happen in the following weeks), some bigger themes emerged.
One of the greater themes that I was able to wrap my head around, albeit in a limited way, is the tension between public and private benefit. Working in the non-profit sector, I know that the work that I do contributes to the greater public benefit and that’s a big motivator for everyone in my sector. It certainly isn’t the $$ private benefit of my pocketbook. But I’ve never really conceptualized what kind of world we would live in if these spheres were to bleed into one another. Social enterprise and finances are part of this idea, and I imagine we will see more and more innovative ways to try and maximize all benefits. Whether or not this is a good thing, or has somewhat negative consequences, we don’t know yet. In fact, much of the coursework so far has resulted in a lot of nuanced, unsure grey areas with very good intentions.
What, as I am sure you are wondering, if you have even read this far (don’t blame you if you’ve quit by now) is what the hell this all has to do with municipal office…and I guess where I’m going is that if I was to try and move into politics, I would have to leave either particular sphere. I would be working with private companies as well as non-profits, and would leave the world in which I can naively believe that everyone in it has public benefit as their driving force. I would have to welcome diverse points of view, some of which could be extreme and hurtful and self-serving. And I would have to be ok with that. At least meet everyone from where they were at and try and work from within those systems.
As a person of office elect, would I be selling out… I can’t think so. I don’t feel that I would have to become unbound from my love of common good and doing the right thing. I would have to become less of an actor, maybe, directly, in these causes and become more of a facilitator. As someone who can provide the space and time to discuss these interests, maybe I could still carve out a little place for public benefit, and sort of more meaningful to me then roads, and sewers and stuff. Although I would have to really pay attention to those things too, but maybe I could blend some of that private and public benefit … these are the ideas I’m wrestling with right now, and I don’t have the answers. I’m not even sure this shit is logical, or legible. I’m at the point now where words don’t really look right, and my brain is so mushy. But I hope that when some degree of sharpness returns, some clarity will come.
I love Ottawa, and I would love to serve Ottawa. What that would look like would be just fascinating. But boy I am I tried.